
July 2026 Market Recap: AI Is No Longer About Hype. It's About Returns.
If June reminded investors that good economic news can sometimes become bad market news, July highlighted a different reality: the market is no longer questioning whether artificial intelligence is transformative. It is beginning to ask who will ultimately profit from it.
After several years in which investors largely rewarded companies simply for increasing AI investment, July marked a turning point. Capital expenditures, cloud demand, infrastructure costs, and return on investment became the dominant themes of earnings season.
That shift occurred against a backdrop of renewed geopolitical tensions, moderating inflation, and a labor market that continued sending mixed signals about the health of the U.S. economy.
The result was another volatile month. The S&P 500 declined approximately -0.06% (per S&P Global), while Treasury yields moved higher as renewed conflict between the United States and Iran reignited inflation concerns and pressured fixed income markets.
The Economy Slowed, But Not Enough to Change the Bigger Picture
The month began with an unexpected surprise from the labor market. On July 2, June Nonfarm Payrolls increased by just 57,000 jobs (per U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistic), roughly half of economists' expectations (estimate of 115,000 jobs per Dow Jones).
Ordinarily, weaker employment data would increase fears of recession. Instead, markets reacted only modestly as investors increasingly viewed the report through a different lens. Rather than suggesting the economy was entering a recession, many viewed it as evidence that labor market conditions were gradually cooling without collapsing. More importantly, attention quickly shifted toward inflation, where investors hoped softer economic activity would begin translating into lower price pressures.
That optimism may have proved correct.
Inflation Finally Offered Some Relief
The market's next major test arrived on July 14 with the release of June Consumer Price Index ("CPI") data. Headline inflation increased 3.5% year-over-year (per U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistic), below expectations of 3.8% (per Dow Jones).
Producer Price Index data the following day also surprised to the downside (5.5% year-over-year growth per U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics vs an expected 6.2% per Dow Jones). For the first time since the Iran conflict began in late February, investors received evidence that inflation may be moderating. Markets briefly embraced the possibility that the Federal Reserve would have less reason to tighten monetary policy further, and as such, markets began discounting the probability of a rate hike.
Unfortunately, that optimism would prove short-lived amid renewed tensions with the Iran conflict.
The Middle East Returned to Center Stage
Just weeks after the United States and Iran signed a Memorandum of Understanding intended to pause hostilities, the conflict reignited. Following attacks on commercial vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz, the United States responded with military strikes against Iranian targets and revoked Iran's oil export license. Oil prices immediately surged and treasury yields followed.
The market quickly returned to worrying that higher energy prices could reverse the progress recently made on inflation. While both countries ultimately agreed to pause military operations later in the month, the episode served as another reminder that geopolitical events continue to influence inflation expectations and, by extension, interest-rate policy. It’s also become increasingly clear that the situation remains very much fluid, which may continue to add to market volatility.
The AI Conversation Changed
However, macro economic data and conflicts in the Middle East were not the only things in focus during July. There were major corporate earnings releases during the month of July, which included Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, Intel, Tesla and Apple.
Collectively, they offered an indication to one of the market's biggest questions. AI demand is not slowing, but rather, seemingly accelerating.
Alphabet reported earnings after market close on July 22 and delivered another strong cloud quarter while raising expected capital expenditures by approximately $15 billion. This was the first of the several dominos to fall, and it did not disappoint.
The following day, Intel reported earnings after the close. They produced its strongest earnings report in more than a decade and likewise increased investment in AI infrastructure.
Next, Microsoft reported its earnings after market close on July 29. The highlight was that Azure growth exceeded expectations while continuing to demonstrate meaningful commercial adoption of Microsoft Copilot.
Just the next day, Amazon reported earnings after the bell and similarly reported accelerating AWS growth while increasing capital expenditure guidance once again.
The theme from just these four companies was seemingly clear: Demand for AI computing capacity continues to exceed available supply, and these companies do not plan slowing investment any time soon.
However, there will be distinct winners and losers from AI investment. Investors will continue focusing on who will ultimately earn attractive returns on the hundreds of billions of dollars currently being invested. Additionally, investors will continue to focus on where the bottlenecks in the AI supply chain exist. As it currently stands, bottlenecks continue to exist with memory chips and compute. With massive AI spend not going anywhere, the focus will continue to be on companies operating on that side of the supply chain.
AI Spending Is Becoming More Selective
This shift was particularly evident among the “hyperscalers”, which is term coined by Wall Street to describe the big corporate spenders of AI infrastructure. According to their respective guidance from their recent earnings reports, Alphabet, Meta, Amazon and Microsoft are collectively expected to invest hundreds of billions of dollars this year building data centers, purchasing GPUs and memory chips, expanding networking capacity and supporting rapidly growing AI workloads.
Alphabet, Microsoft, and Alphabet largely convinced investors that those investments are already generating meaningful revenue with their latest earnings report.
Meta and Tesla continue to invest aggressively while investors questioned how quickly those investments can or will be monetized.
Ultimately, markets are no longer rewarding AI investment simply because it exists. They increasingly want evidence that those investments can generate real return.
Memory May Be One of the Biggest Beneficiaries
One interesting takeaway from earnings was that even Apple acknowledged ongoing shortages of advanced chips and memory. Meta Platforms also cited during its earnings call how they actually underestimated their compute needs, despite their continued high capex spend.
Unlike some software companies that are investing in AI infrastructure, suppliers throughout the semiconductor ecosystem continue benefiting from constrained supply and exceptionally strong demand. That distinction may become increasingly important over the coming years. The companies buying AI infrastructure may experience near-term pressure on margins, while the companies supplying that infrastructure may continue benefiting from favorable pricing and demand dynamics. Right now, investors are seemingly trying to discern whether semiconductors can maintain those margins beyond the current supply shortage and whether the hyperscalers can scale their infrastructure spend. In our view, there will be winners and losers on both sides. Understanding which side of that equation a company falls on may become one of the defining investment themes of the next phase of the AI cycle.
Looking Ahead
July did not provide evidence that AI investment is slowing. It demonstrated that demand remains exceptionally strong; however, the debate has simply become more sophisticated. The market is no longer asking whether and how much companies should invest in AI, but rather, which companies can transform unprecedented investment into sustainable profitability over the next 5 years. That is likely to remain one of the defining questions for markets during the second half of 2026 and into 2027.
Disclosure
The S&P 500 (Standard & Poor's 500) is a stock market index tracking the performance of roughly 500 leading U.S. publicly traded companies, representing about 80% of the total U.S. market capitalization.
The Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index (often called "the Agg") is a broad-based, market-capitalization-weighted benchmark measuring the performance of the US dollar-denominated, investment-grade, fixed-rate taxable bond market.
The reader should not assume that investment decisions identified and discussed were or will be profitable. Specific investment advice references provided herein are for illustrative purposes only and are not necessarily representative of investments that will be made in the future.
*This document does not constitute advice or a recommendation or offer to sell or a solicitation to deal in any security or financial product. It is provided for information purposes only and on the understanding that the recipient has sufficient knowledge and experience to be able to understand and make their own evaluation of the proposals and services described herein, any risks associated therewith and any related legal, tax, accounting or other material considerations. *
Certain information contained herein has been obtained from third party sources and such information has not been independently verified by Global Beta Advisors (“Global Beta”). No representation, warranty, or undertaking, expressed or implied, is given to the accuracy or completeness of such information by Global Beta or any other person. While such sources are believed to be reliable, Global Beta does not assume any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of such information. Global Beta does not undertake any obligation to update the information contained herein as of any future date.
Except where otherwise indicated, the information contained in this presentation is based on matters as they exist as of the date of preparation of such material and not as of the date of distribution or any future date. Recipients should not rely on this material in making any future investment decision.
Certain information contained herein constitutes “forward-looking statements,” which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “project,” “estimate,” “intend,” “continue,” or “believe,” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events, results or actual performance may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Nothing contained herein may be relied upon as a guarantee, promise, assurance or a representation as to the future.
The results discussed herein are derived from both quantitative and qualitative factors, including historical returns and market conditions and assumptions. The projected results are presented to establish a benchmark for future evaluation of its performance, to provide a measure to assist in assessing the anticipated risk and reward characteristics of an investment to facilitate comparisons with other investments. Any target data or other forecasts contained herein are based upon highly subjective estimates and assumptions about circumstances and events that may not yet have taken place and may never do so. If any of the assumptions used do not prove to be true, results may vary substantially. The projected investment returns are pre-tax and represent possible returns that may be achieved. The projected investment returns are subject to change at any time and are current as of the date hereof only. In any given year, there may be significant variation from these projections, there is no guarantee that they will be able to achieve the projected investment returns in the short term or the long term.
The results contained herein are for illustrative purposes only, do not represent the performance of any Global Beta Advisor Artha product or any particular investment, and are not intended to predict or depict future results. Performance does not reflect the deduction of fees or expenses, returns received by an investor would otherwise be lower.
